What do
semi-automatic rifles mean for hunting in PA?
By Tyler Frantz
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
While
walking into a Maryland public land deer stand this past November, two hunting
partners of mine crossed paths with a hunter carrying a semi-automatic hunting
rifle. There was no mistaking it, especially to a pair of down-home
Pennsylvania boys; this rifle looked like an alien in the deer woods.
When
my curious friends asked the hunter about his weapon of choice, he explained
that MD law permits eight cartridges to a rifle, but he only carries a magazine
of five. “Shouldn’t need more than that anyway,” he said before wishing them
luck and parting ways.
It
was a rare but interesting encounter at the time, though it may become a little
more common in our home state in the near future.
Coincidentally,
the very same week, Governor Tom Wolf signed into law a bill that legalized semi-automatic
and air rifles, giving the Pennsylvania Game Commission authority to
regulate their use in hunting situations. In doing so, Pennsylvania became the
final state legislature in the union to authorize semis for hunting.
At
the January PGC board meeting, Commissioners gave these modern weapons
preliminary approval, but did not set any specific regulations on which seasons
they might be permitted, nor did they offer any magazine capacity or caliber
restrictions. The finalized approval vote will only take place at the next
board meeting at the end of March.
Needless
to say, this news has roused quite a stir in the hunting community, with some
enthusiastically in favor and others completely opposed to allowing semis. The
supporters view it as a gun rights victory, knowing it should boost sales and
allow greater flexibility in weapon choice. Those against it worry about deer
being killed too easily and ponder the threat of safety concerns.
As
a person who has never shot, owned, or even had a desire to own an AR, I am
somewhere in the middle, perhaps with many others who don’t have a real opinion
either way. Some might claim apathy is taking the easy way out, but I honestly
don’t care if we have semis for hunting or not.
Though
I’m in no position to speculate, it is my guess that the PGC will slowly phase
ARs into the mix, maybe for predators, and then add more opportunities as they
see fit. It’s up to them to listen to those they serve, find a happy medium and
make a fair decision.
Regardless,
I don’t think it is going to have a drastic effect one way or the other. Those
who are into ARs may see them as a modern tool and a fun new way to pursue
game. If legal, go for it and hunt safely. I’ll probably stick with my
bolt-action rifle, because that’s what I like and that’s what I’m comfortable
shooting.
As
for the safety concerns or claims of an unfair advantage, I didn’t recall
hearing the Maryland man’s semi blitzing away over the ridge last November. He
may or may not have shot his five rounds, but if he did, I didn’t notice
anything different from just another opening day in the deer woods. I certainly
wasn’t dodging any bullets- that’s for sure.
Just
like the never ending traditional vs. compound vs. crossbow archery debate,
some will be happy and some will be disgruntled no matter the decision, and
everyone has his or her own preference. The bigger picture is that we’re all in
this together, and we all love hunting with our own methods. If you feel strongly about something, voice your opinion, but respect others' as well.
Supporting
each other’s legal right to hunt wild game with a weapon of their choosing is
the way to go, whether it be by stick and string, patch and ball, lead or
steel, blued barrel or vented muzzle, it doesn’t matter. The simple right to
hunt is what’s really important. Let’s not forget that.
UPDATE--- March 28, 2017 PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION NEWS RELEASE:
For more great writing, photography and video work by outdoors freelancer, Tyler Frantz, visit www.naturalpursuitoutdoors.com. Also, please LIKE US ON FACEBOOK!
UPDATE--- March 28, 2017 PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION NEWS RELEASE:
SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLES OK’D FOR SMALL GAME, FURBEARERS
Guided by scientific survey of state’s hunters, commissioners remove proposal for big-game.
Hunters heading afield in
the 2017-18 seasons will be able to carry semiautomatic rifles for
hunting small game and furbearers, but not for big game, based on
regulatory changes approved today by the Pennsylvania
Board of Game Commissioners.
The commissioners in
January preliminarily approved a proposal that would have allowed
semiautomatic rifles to be used in any season where manually operated
centerfire rifles now can be used.
The board today amended
that measure, giving final approval to hunting small game and furbearers
with semiautomatic rifles beginning in the 2017-18 seasons. It made no
changes to the list of lawful sporting arms
for hunting big game.
Commissioners said a clear
majority of Pennsylvania hunters voiced opposition to hunting big game
with semiautomatic rifles at this time, and the board’s vote reflects
that opinion.
Between the Board of
Commissioners’ preliminary vote and the vote today, Game Commission
staff conducted a scientific survey from a random sample of 4,000 of the
state’s hunters, more than 2,000 of whom responded.
The findings of that survey were presented to the commissioners at the
board’s meeting on Monday.
The findings of the survey
show clear support for hunting furbearers (55 percent support or
strongly support), woodchucks (51 percent support or strongly support)
and small game (42 percent support or strongly support,
and 12 percent neither support nor oppose) with semiautomatic rifles.
For big game, while 28
percent of survey respondents expressed support or strong support for
semiautomatic rifles, 64 percent of respondents said they opposed or
strongly opposed semiautomatic rifles for big-game
hunting, with 52 percent saying they were strongly opposed.
The results bolstered the
expressed opposition to hunting big game with semiautomatic rifles that
appeared to a lesser extent in the written comments the Game Commission
received in recent months.
“We listened to our hunters,” President Commissioner Brian H. Hoover said.
With the changes,
semiautomatic rifles in .22 caliber or less that propel
single-projectile ammunition and semiautomatic shotguns 10 gauge or
smaller propelling ammunition not larger than No. 4 lead – also No. 2
steel or No. 4 composition or alloy – will be legal firearms for
small-game seasons in the 2017-18 license year, which begins July 1.
Semiautomatic firearms
that propel single-projectile ammunition also will be legal sporting
arms for woodchucks and furbearers, and there is no caliber restriction
for woodchucks or furbearers.
The measure also approves the use of air guns for hunting small game and furbearers.
Air-guns will be legal for small game in calibers from .177 to .22 that propel single-projectile pellets or bullets.
For woodchucks and
furbearers, air-guns must be at least .22 caliber and propel a
single-projectile pellet or bullet. BB ammunition is not authorized for
small game, furbearers or woodchucks.
Pennsylvania historically
prohibited the use of semiautomatic rifles for hunting, but a law that
took effect in November enables the Game Commission to regulate
semiautomatic rifles and air guns for hunting.
With today’s vote, Pennsylvania becomes the last state in the nation to approve semiautomatic rifles for hunting uses.
Following their vote, the
commissioners said if growing support for hunting big game with
semiautomatic rifles emerges at some point in the future, they will give
consideration to further regulatory changes.
Fact-finding by
Pennsylvania Game Commission staff revealed no higher incidence of
hunting accidents in any state where semiautomatics are permitted, and
many firearms experts have said they believe semiautomatics
are safer in that they allow for continuous focus on the target and
often require the shooter to absorb less recoil.
The survey on hunting with
semiautomatic rifles also showed greater support among younger age
groups for semiautomatic rifle hunting, including the use of
semiautomatic rifles to hunt big game.
But no such provision will be adopted for the 2017-18 license year.
0 Comments