The glam rock movement of the
early-to-mid-seventies, which made household names of a clutch of pop groups
who’d been peddling their wares since the sixties (but who only managed to sell
records once they started dressing up in the most outrageous outfits imaginable,
and wearing more make-up than a coachload of Lily Savages) and provided a defiantly
feel-good soundtrack to a way of life played out against a depressing backdrop
of strikes, IRA bombing campaigns, power cuts and parsimony necessitated by the
Heath government’s three day week, produced only a handful of cinematic texts.
This in itself is surprising, especially when you consider its all-encompassing
popularity (which never quite managed to cross the Atlantic – although several
of the groups toured the US incessantly, American audiences remained immune to
this peculiarly British movement until the likes of Quiet Riot and the Runaways
started covering Slade’s old songs) and the tendency in previous decades for
profit-hungry producers to construct jerry-built big screen vehicles around the
most unlikely of groups (see the Freddie and the Dreamers vehicle Cuckoo Patrol – or, rather, don’t).
Granted, the charismatic Marc Bolan
managed to secure the services of none other than Ringo Starr to direct his big-screen
offering Born to Boogie – fine as
long as it stuck to the galvanizing concert footage, less impressive when it
delved into whimsical fantasy sequences all too similar to those in the
Beatles’ psychedelic misfire Magical
Mystery Tour – but even Gary Glitter’s most ardent fans (of which there
were several, right up until the unpleasant revelations of the late nineties
which effectively scuppered his career on a permanent basis) must have felt
rightfully short-changed by the Leader’s misbegotten 1974 effort Remember Me This Way, a startlingly
self-indulgent combination of concert film, half-cocked action thriller and
vanity project. As the TV Cream
website noted, never has a film’s title acquired so much tragic irony in the
light of subsequent events. Meanwhile, the adherents of such chart-topping glam
icons as Sweet, Suzi Quatro, Alvin Stardust and Wizzard were denied the chance
to see their idols in glorious larger-than-life widescreen at their local
fleapit, and the millions of screaming fans of the Bay City Rollers, a
tartan-bedecked Scottish bootleg of the Four Seasons, would have to wait until
1981 before a somewhat depleted line-up of the group (minus lead singer Les
McKeown and lead guitarist Eric Faulkner) made their belated big screen debut in
the deservedly obscure motor-racing action adventure Burning Rubber. Suffice to say, it really wasn’t worth the wait,
despite the best efforts of the reliable journeyman director Norman Cohen
behind the cameras.
The foundations for the key texts of
British rock films in the seventies – which is to say, films that offered up
dollops of escapist pop alongside large helpings of gritty realism – were laid in
1967’s astonishing Privilege, a
vehicle for the former Manfred Mann frontman Paul Jones, with a screenplay
based on an idea by Johnny Speight, the acclaimed comedy writer responsible for
the hit BBC sitcom Till Death Us Do Part
(1965-75). Given that Jones’ time in the band saw him singing irresistible
slices of goofy, throwaway pop like ‘5-4-3-2-1’, ‘Doo Wah Diddy Diddy’ and
‘Pretty Flamingo’, and Speight had created one of the decade’s landmark
situation comedies (along with its standout character, a bigoted, racist,
chauvinistic and unapologetically right-wing docker called Alf Garnett, played
with devastating ease by Warren Mitchell), you’d be forgiven for thinking that Privilege was going to be another slice
of swinging sixties nonsense cut from the same cloth as Michael Winner’s caper
comedy You Must Be Joking! (1965) or a
sharp slice of Carnaby Street-suited-and-booted satire like Stanley Donen’s Bedazzled (1967), which saw Peter Cook’s
stylish Satan offering Dudley Moore’s lovelorn short-order burger chef seven
wishes in exchange for his soul. Yet Privilege
was a very different beast indeed, an uncompromisingly raw, angry and shocking
polemic crafted with an unflinching attention to detail by Peter Watkins, the
film-maker du jour who invented the
docudrama genre virtually single-handed.
Watkins had caused a sensation with
his 1964 BBC historical drama Culloden,
which had cleverly presented Scotland’s Jacobite rebellion of 1746 as if the
events had been covered by a modern documentary crew, but nothing could have
prepared the Corporation for Watkins’ next offering. 1965’s the War Game, created for the anthology
series the Wednesday Play, presented
a fictional Soviet nuclear attack on England in the manner of a current events
programme – complete with vox pops interviews, a dispassionate off-screen
narrator, fly-on-the-wall footage, news reportage, the plentiful use of
captions and ‘talking head’ segments including the testimonies of doctors,
psychiatrists, Anglican Bishops and nuclear strategists – and was far too hot
for the BBC to handle. Not even the familiar, soothing tones of Michael Aspel
on narration duties could dilute its sledgehammer impact, and after much
deliberation and consultation with senior government figures, the official line
given by the Corporation was that the War
Game was ‘too horrifying for the medium of broadcasting’ (though it has
since been revealed that the film’s suppression was far more of a governmental
concern than anyone was willing to admit at the time) and Watkins’ film was
shelved for the next twenty years, finally being granted its television debut a
full year after Mick Jackson’s similarly bleak and disturbing Threads (1984) had traumatized an entire
generation with its no-punches-pulled depiction of a nuclear attack on
Sheffield. The War Game wasn’t banned
completely – Watkins fought for the film to be shown abroad (which resulted in
a prestigious Academy Award for Best Documentary – despite it being fiction –
in 1966) and on the burgeoning arthouse cinema / college film society / CND
protest meeting circuit in England – but the damage had been done, and Watkins
quit the BBC in protest. Little wonder that his first big-screen outing would
prove similarly contentious.
Privilege takes place
in ‘Britain in the near future’ where the Labour party and the Conservative
party are perceived as virtually identical, leading to the formation of a
coalition government whose prime concern is the enforcement of blanket
conformity on the populace. To that end, the state has assumed control of the
career of an apparently infinitely malleable young pop singer named Steve
Shorter (Jones) who is currently enjoying a wave of popularity that makes the
levels of fame previously scaled by Cliff Richard and the Beatles look
positively paltry – his return to his home city of Birmingham warrants a
welcoming tickertape parade, the streets lined with adoring crowds, the film’s
narrator describing him as ‘the most desperately loved entertainer in the
world’. His name and image are used to sell everything from apples to dog food
and to promote everything from discotheques to boutiques. Without the
government behind him, he’d be indistinguishable from the rest of the pop-star
crowd, hawking his latest single on Top
of the Pops. With their backing, however, he’s practically the new Messiah.
The stage act that led to Shorter’s
current celebrity status is a combination of the Theatre of the Absurd and
rabble-rousing rock theatricality (no doubt inspired by the Who’s early
adherence to ‘auto-destructive art’ – in other words, destroying their
instruments and amplifiers as a combined audio-visual spectacle and a
deliberate statement on ‘throwaway culture’ and passive consumerism – but
several years before similarly performance art-reliant rock acts like Alice
Cooper and Kiss became household names, or the Kinks became cult heroes in the
US by touring a series of increasingly whimsical concept albums accompanied by
cut-price Vaudevillian stage shows) which sees him arrested, slung into a cell,
clubbed by thuggish actors dressed as prison guards and pleading for his
freedom with a series of overwrought mid-tempo rock numbers that make Tom Jones
sound positively restrained by comparison.
Shorter’s performances provide a
necessary cathartic release for his audiences ‘from the nervous tension caused
by the state of the world outside’ – in other words, in the eyes of the government,
it’s better to have the kids screaming over this pantomime ritual than clogging
up the streets with their futile banners and marches, protesting about matters
that hardly concern them anyway. Yet Shorter’s martyr routine is already
beginning to wear thin, and a new image is being planned for him behind closed
doors – one which will see him renouncing his bad-boy ways (it’s inferred that
Shorter was arrested at one point) and embracing a new, clean-living image,
adherent to God and country, a cynical move designed to prompt a mass public
embrace of unquestioning ‘fruitful conformity’. Fears of a military right-wing
takeover would resurface throughout the seventies, as expressed in both
pessimistic and optimistic terms by such memorable characters as Harold Steptoe
in a 1974 Steptoe and Son episode,
and by Reggie’s brother-in-law Jimmy in the
Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin. Jimmy, as embodied by Geoffrey Palmer,
was planning to form his own private military unit to take on the ‘forces of
anarchy’ when ‘the balloon goes up’. His extensive blacklist included punk rock,
keg bitter, rapists and Clive Jenkins. The character proved so successful, he was
eventually given his own series, Fairly
Secret Army, which ran on Channel Four from 1984.
Meanwhile, the golden boy at the
centre of their manipulative endeavours is beginning to fray at the edges.
Shorter has found out the hard way that he’s sold his soul for success and lost
his individuality in the process, and he spends most of the film moping his way
through a series of increasingly absurd press calls, photo calls, receptions
and film shoots with a face like a wet weekend in Newport Pagnell. The path to
his eventual self-destructive rejection of his entirely fabricated persona and
subsequent persona non gratia status
in the media is smoothed by the introduction of Vanessa Ritchie, an artist who
has been commissioned to paint his portrait.
Cognisant of the gulf between the
‘real’ Steve and his public persona, Ritchie (played by Jean Shrimpton,
arguably the first ever ‘supermodel’, who – it must be said – acts about as
convincingly as a cardboard cut-out, but her distant, mannered performance
works fairly well in a film that’s all about the importance of style over
content) responds to the commission by producing an unsettling likeness that’s
part-death mask and part-blank-eyed void, inadvertently revealing the terrible
truth – Steve is just an empty canvas onto which the public can project its own
fantasies – that is, after the government have finished bending him to fit
their latest whims. In this regard, Jones (who gives a very good account of
himself nonetheless) was an inspired casting choice – a more charismatic and
distinctive performer such as Mick Jagger would have tilted the film too far
into ‘star vehicle’ territory, whilst Jones, with his bland, slightly acne-scarred
good looks, modish yet neat haircut and pleasant, tuneful voice fits the bill
perfectly.
After unveiling his new Christian
image (complete with supporting acts in ecclesiastical garb performing
rocked-up versions of ‘Jerusalem’ and ‘Onward Christian Soldiers’ and some
disturbing Nazi overtones) at an open air concert that doubles as a mass rally,
Shorter finally snaps, using an industry back-slapping ceremony to vent his
spleen at the public, his management and the puppet masters who’ve been
controlling him all this time. His fall from grace is swift and merciless –
Shorter’s music is banned from the airwaves, and he is expressly forbidden from
speaking or performing in public again. In a postscript, the narrator confides
that there is very little left to remind the public of Shorter’s astonishing
career, save for a few old records and a scrap of black and white archive
footage with the sound missing. With the country’s equilibrium back on an even
keel, and no shortage of faceless pop idols willing to take Shorter’s place,
the narrator muses that ‘it is going to be a happy time in England, this year
in the near future’.
Perhaps inevitably for one of the most
pessimistic depictions of the music industry and the nature of stardom ever
committed to celluloid, Privilege opened almost unanimously
negative reviews. Whilst some of this could have been merely belated examples
of petty point-scoring and score-settling left over from the controversy that
surrounded the War Game (during
which, it must be noted, none of Watkins’ peers or contemporaries – which
included such luminaries as Tony Richardson and Lindsay Anderson – spoke out in
his defence, instead falling back on non-committal musings on how Watkins had
bitten the hand that was feeding him and thrown away his sizeable chance of
mainstream acceptance, whilst contemporary critics pondered on Watkins’ sanity
and integrity), it’s sobering to realise that several contemporary reviewers
seemed predisposed toward dismissing the film out of hand without even
bothering themselves to watch it in the first place. John Russell Taylor of the Times described the film as
‘juvenile’ (which it most assuredly is not) and ‘a comment on the swinging pop
scene’, which simply made him sound like the squarest parent on the block,
whilst the Financial Times’ critic,
not content with erroneously describing Privilege
as Watkins’ debut, found it ‘alternatively arresting and ridiculous’,
maintaining that ‘teenage taste still has an odd way of favouring
professionalism, artistry and certain qualities of warmth and vitality and
humour’ – whilst completely missing the point that Privilege was deliberately designed
as a ‘cold’ film, combining the stylings of the documentary and reportage
genres with the unidentified narrator acting as a further distancing mechanism,
and any film that follows the gradual mental disintegration of a pop singer
ruthlessly milked and exploited until he’s a husk of his former self was never
going to be a barrel of laughs anyway. (Furthermore, the ‘warmth, vitality and
humour’ displayed by the Beatles – inarguably the biggest group of the decade,
and the act the Financial Times’
critic undoubtedly had in mind – artfully concealed the fact that they were one
of the most neurotic acts in the business.)
Only Penelope Gilliat in the
Observer sounded a positive note, describing ‘Peter Watkins’s vision of his
country’ as possessing ‘the unforgiving rancour of the
genuinely prophetic’, but one cheer doesn’t make an ovation, and Privilege looked doomed to wither on the
vine. In the event, the Rank Organization, which handled its British
distribution on behalf of Universal Pictures (who had bankrolled the film to
the tune of a cool £700,000) performed a mercy killing. Taking its courage from
Alexander Walker’s London Evening
Standard review, which described the film as ‘immoral and un-Christian’ and
denounced the way in which it ‘defied authority and encouraged youth in lewd
practices’, the Rank Organization withdrew the film from general circuit
bookings, and that was that. Aside from a single television screening in May
1975 (ironically on the BBC), Privilege
was swept into the dustbin of history as gracelessly and apparently irrevocably
as its doomed protagonist, not even granted a second life on home video. In
fact, it wasn’t until 2010 that the film finally received a home media release,
thanks to the BFI’s excellent Flipside imprint. That said, though, it seems
that enough people saw Privilege
first time around, because its influence on later films such as Ken Russell’s Tommy (of which more later) and Alan
Parker’s remorselessly downbeat screen treatment of Pink Floyd – the Wall (1982) seems remarkably obvious. It goes
without saying that Privilege was a
hugely prescient picture, and retains its satirical impact even today – think
about the fate of poor Steve Shorter next time you start wondering whatever
happened to any of the numerous winners of the
X-Factor or Britain’s Got Talent.
0 Comments